What is the difference between unemployment at 8.2% and
unemployment at 7%? Answer: the
Republican Party.
The Republican Party’s persistent opposition to helping
states and local governments avoid laying off public employees is almost
TOTALLY responsible for the difference in unemployment that we might have
expected at this point in the recovery (about 7% or so) and the level of
unemployment that we have (over 8%). The
Republican Party INTENTIONALLY inflicted this pain on America. They did so because the leaders of the party
and party strategists decided shortly after the 2008 election that the best
road to control of the House, Senate and White House for Republicans was one
based upon delaying and obstructing any and all efforts by the Obama
administration and Democrats to stimulate employment in the private sector and
prevent the loss of jobs in the public sector.
Republicans were only partially successful in blocking
private sector job growth. They were not
able to totally block the 2009 stimulus.
As a result, the private sector has been adding jobs in a pattern
similar to what we saw in the last two previous recessions. However, Republicans have been VERY
successful in purposely generating public employee job losses at the local and
state level through a combination of delay and obstruction at the national
level to proposed for relief to the states and orchestrated action at the state
level by Republican-controlled state Governors and legislatures to eliminate as
many public jobs as possible.
We now have clear evidence of the damage Republicans have done for the most cynical of political reasons.
It would be a shame if Republicans are rewarded with success at the ballot box for such behavior.
Read the analysis here: http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog1.php/2012/07/11/public-employment-this-time-its-different
No comments:
Post a Comment