The main argument Republicans make for opposing raising the
top marginal rate on those making over $250,000 (or letting the Bush tax breaks
expire for those making over $250,000) is that any tax increase on the top
earners would be a job killer since small business owners would have less money
to hire workers. Let’s leave aside for a
moment the fact that only 1.9% of small business owners make over $250,000 and
half of those make most of their money through investments and don’t have
employees anyway.
Let’s assume that a small business owner has employees and
has a taxable income over $250,000.
Also, let’s assume that this business owner would like to hire
additional workers to meet increased demands for products/services from
customers that he can’t meet with existing staff. Would an increase in the top marginal rate or
top two marginal rates keep him from hiring these additional workers? Not likely.
Here is why.
If you are a small business owner, you probably have a LLC
or similar company with “pass through” taxation. In other words, your company doesn’t pay
taxes, instead the profits of the firm represent income to you and you pay
income taxes on those profits (or your portion if you have partners). Notice, you pay income taxes on the profits—revenues
minus expenses. Employee pay is one of
those expenses that you CAN DEDUCT. The
IRS says: You can generally deduct the
pay you give your employees for the services they perform. The pay may be in
cash, property, or services. It may include wages, salaries, or other
compensation such as vacation allowances, bonuses, commissions, and fringe
benefits. See: http://www.irs.gov/publications/p535/ch02.html
Now think about it.
Since you DEDUCT employee and other employee expenses BEFORE you
determine your profits/income, an increase in your top marginal tax rate has no
impact what-so-ever on your decision to hire more employees. It’s a wash.
In fact, if you want to pay LESS taxes, your best strategy
when your top marginal rate went up would be to HIRE MORE EMPLOYEES. How is that?
Given the same amount of revenues, if you hire more employees, you
reduce your company’s profits and therefore your taxable income by the amount
you pay out in salaries for those additional workers. You have LESS taxable income, so you pay LESS
taxes. It’s that simple.
In fact, if you really wanted to teach the IRS and Obama and
Democrats a lesson, you could calculate just how much your taxes would go up
with the higher marginal tax rates and hire enough workers that you could cut
you profits/income to offset any increases in taxes you might otherwise have to
pay.
Of course, those new employees might increase customer
satisfaction to such a level or develop enough new high demand products and
services that your revenues took off, your company grew exponentially and you
started taking home profits/income of $ 1 million or $1 billion a year rather
than $300,000. In that case, you WOULD
be paying more in taxes. You might
become as rich as Romney and have to begin stashing cash in off shore accounts. So, it’s a tough decision. BUT, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOP
MARGINAL TAX RATE.
No comments:
Post a Comment